Salenger Sack Kimmel & Bavaro logo

Hip & Joint Implant Lawsuits

DON'T WAIT!
GET HELP NOW.
Call (800) 675-8556 or fill out this form for a FREE Consultation
Consent

Hip and Metal Implant Lawsuit Attorneys

Two X-ray images showing hip joint replacements with metal implants and screws visible in the pelvic and femoral regions.

Legal Help for Victims of Failed or Recalled Hip Implants

When hip replacement devices fail, the results can be catastrophic — causing chronic pain, tissue damage, metallosis, or the need for revision surgery. Several manufacturers have recalled defective or poorly designed hip and metal-on-metal implants, exposing thousands of patients to serious health risks.

At Salenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavaro (SSKB), we are investigating claims on behalf of patients nationwide who suffered complications after receiving defective hip implants — including those made by Zimmer Biomet, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, Encore, and OMNILife Science.


What Is a Hip or Joint Replacement?

Joint replacement surgery, or arthroplasty, involves removing damaged cartilage and replacing it with an artificial implant made of metal, ceramic, or plastic. The goal is to restore movement, reduce pain, and improve quality of life. Unfortunately, not all implants perform as intended.


Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Recall

On July 2, 2024, Zimmer Biomet issued a voluntary recall of its CPT Hip System Femoral Stem 12/14 Neck Taper after reports of mechanical failure at the modular junction. The manufacturer announced plans to phase out sales by the end of 2024.

Patients implanted with this device have reported:

  • Pain and swelling around the joint
  • Loosening or instability
  • Corrosion or fretting at the neck taper junction
  • Need for premature revision surgery

This recall adds to Zimmer Biomet’s history of product-safety issues, including prior settlements involving the Durom Cup and M2a Magnum hip implants. Our firm is now actively reviewing cases involving CPT Hip System failures, particularly where revision surgery occurred less than 13 years after implantation.

Encore Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants

Although there is no consolidated litigation for Encore Metal-on-Metal hips, SSKB and partner counsel have successfully resolved individual cases involving these defective devices.

Patients experienced:

  • Metal debris shedding into the bloodstream
  • Pain, inflammation, and tissue necrosis
  • Revision surgery due to metallosis or implant failure

If your Encore implant failed or caused elevated cobalt/chromium ion levels, our attorneys can help evaluate your claim.

OMNILife Science Apex K2 and Apex Arc Modular Neck Devices and Smith & Nephew SMF/REDAPT Modular Neck Devices

While no consolidated federal litigation currently exists for these modular-neck hip replacements, we have successfully resolved numerous claims involving corrosion and mechanical failure at the modular neck junction.

Reported issues include:

  • Fretting and corrosion between neck and stem components
  • Pain, instability, or audible clicking
  • Elevated metal-ion levels (metallosis)
  • Revision surgery due to component fracture or loosening

Patients who underwent revision surgery within 12 years of their initial implant may still qualify for compensation.

Smith & Nephew Emperion Femoral Stem Failures

The Smith & Nephew Emperion Femoral Stem has not been part of a formal MDL, but numerous patients experienced fractures of the femoral stem leading to urgent revision surgery. These fractures often occur without trauma, suggesting a design or material-strength defect. If you suffered a sudden fracture of your Emperion stem, contact our team to discuss a potential legal claim.

Smith & Nephew R3 Metal-on-Metal Bearing Devices & Birmingham Hip Replacements

A now-closed Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in Maryland addressed thousands of cases involving Smith & Nephew R3 Metal-on-Metal and Birmingham Total Hip Replacements.

Although the MDL is virtually closed, SSKB continues to accept cases where:

  • Revision surgery occurred less than 12 years after the initial implant, and
  • The device failed due to metal wear, metallosis, or component loosening.

We have successfully resolved similar claims and continue to represent patients nationwide affected by toxic metal debris and early device failure.

Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Heads and Accolade/ Meridian/ Citation TMZF Hip Stems

The Stryker LFIT V40 MDL No. 2768 (U.S. District Court – Massachusetts) and related New Jersey state consolidation in Bergen County involved thousands of claims over catastrophic disassociation of the femoral head and corrosion at the taper junction.

Two major confidential settlements were reached in 2018 and 2021, with Ellen Relkin playing a key negotiating role.

While most litigation has concluded, SSKB is still accepting claims for patients who:

  • Underwent revision surgery for head disassociation or corrosion, and
  • Had the device implanted within the past 13 years.

Even though many metal-on-metal failures occurred more than a decade ago, patients revised recently may still be eligible.


Contact Us Today for a FREE Consultation

If you or a loved one has experienced complications from a hip or joint replacement, don’t wait to seek legal help.

Contact Salenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavaro today for a FREE consultation.

Call (800) 675-8556 or contact us online to get started. 


Common Symptoms of Hip Implant Failure

If you’ve received any recalled or metal-on-metal hip implant, be alert for signs of failure, including:

  • Persistent or worsening pain around the hip or groin
  • Swelling or limited mobility
  • Clicking or popping sounds in the joint
  • Unexplained fatigue or skin rashes (from metal toxicity)
  • Elevated cobalt or chromium levels in blood tests
  • Revision surgery or implant removal within 10–13 years

If you are unsure which implant you received, our attorneys can help review your surgical and implant records.

Metallosis and Systemic Metal Poisoning

Many metal-on-metal implants release microscopic debris of cobalt and chromium, which can accumulate in soft tissue and bloodstream, causing metallosis — a serious, sometimes irreversible condition.

Symptoms include:

  • Tissue necrosis around the implant
  • Bone loss and implant loosening
  • Cardiovascular or neurological issues
  • Cognitive impairment or hearing/vision changes

Failure to diagnose metallosis can result in permanent disability. If blood tests confirm elevated metal ions, it is important to seek legal and medical review immediately.

Legal Options and Compensation

Victims of defective hip implants may be eligible for compensation for:

  • Medical bills and revision surgery costs
  • Pain, suffering, and loss of mobility
  • Lost income or future earning capacity
  • Long-term rehabilitation and care expenses
  • Emotional distress and diminished quality of life

Our attorneys investigate claims based on product liability, defective design, failure to warn, negligence, and breach of warranty. In cases involving severe harm or wrongful death, families may also pursue survivorship or wrongful-death claims.

How to Qualify for a Hip Implant Lawsuit

You may qualify if:

  1. You received one of the following implants:
    • Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Femoral Stem
    • Smith & Nephew R3, Birmingham, Emperion, SMF/REDAPT
    • Stryker LFIT V40 or Accolade/Meridian/Citation TMZF stems
    • OMNILife Science Apex K2/Apex Arc devices
    • Encore Metal-on-Metal implants
  2. You required revision surgery due to fracture, corrosion, disassociation, or metal wear.
  3. The failure occurred less than 13 years after initial implantation.
  4. You have documentation such as surgical records, implant stickers, or revision reports.

If your case meets these criteria, our team will provide a free evaluation to determine eligibility for legal action.

Why Choose Salenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavaro

  • Proven Results: Our attorneys have successfully resolved numerous defective-implant and medical-device cases nationwide.
  • Collaborative Expertise: We work closely with leading mass-tort firms and medical experts to build strong claims.
  • No Fees Unless We Win: You pay nothing unless compensation is recovered.
  • Client Care: We understand the pain and uncertainty defective implants cause — and we’re committed to helping you rebuild your life.

Get a Free Case Review

If you or a loved one required revision surgery after a hip replacement involving any recalled or metal-on-metal device, contact our legal team today.

📞 Call (800) 993-8888
📩 Submit our Secure Online Form for a Free, Confidential Case Evaluation

Our attorneys will review your implant details, medical history, and revision records to determine eligibility for compensation.

FAQs

Is there a time limit to file a claim?
Yes. Statutes of limitations vary by state, often ranging from 2 to 3 years from the date of revision surgery or discovery of the defect. Contact us promptly to preserve your rights.

Do I need my implant card or model number?
Not necessarily. We can help obtain your implant information from hospital or surgeon records.

What if my implant failed more than 10 years ago?
Some claims may still qualify if revision occurred within 13 years or if delayed discovery can be proven. We can assess this during your free consultation.

Are there active settlements?
While most large MDLs have concluded, individual settlements remain available for qualifying Zimmer Biomet, Stryker, and Smith & Nephew cases.

Talk to a Hip or Knee Implant Lawyer Today

If you experienced complications from a hip implant recall or defective knee replacement, you may have a valid claim. Our team of hip replacement lawyers, knee replacement attorneys, and medical device litigation experts are here to help.

📞 Call (800) 675-8556 or submit your free case review online.

What Our Clients Are Saying

“The SSKB law firm made the right decision in adding you to their expert team of lawyers. In the future, there isn’t any other firm that I would consider to represent me.”

Jim W.

“Thank you Deborah Kurtz for being my attorney and fighting for me!”

Edwin S.

“Deborah Kurtz is a straight shooter and plays no games all while maintaining the highest level of professionalism.”

Joe M.

“I had them for a case that was very difficult this firm was the best very caring and concerned I was treated like family.”

Robbie J.

“I would highly recommend them due to the fact that during a difficult time, they made the process very straightforward with excellent results.”

Ciara L.

“This being a FELA case it was a very difficult case to handle. This firm came highly recommended to me and I now I know why.”

Joseph B.

“We were so fortunate to find this firm through a recommendation and now we have used them twice for unrelated matters. They have become our “lawyers for life”!”

Dublinshar K.

“Everyone at Salenger, Sack, Kimmel, and Bavaro was respectful and knowledgeable and kept me informed of all proceedings relative to my case as they were occurring.”

Patricia F.
Call Me
We'll call you!
Consent*
Email Us
Send any details you'd like, and we'll get back to you shortly.
Consent*