Salenger Sack Kimmel & Bavaro logo

Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit

DON'T WAIT!
GET HELP NOW.
Call (800) 675-8556 or fill out this form for a FREE Consultation
Consent*
SMS Consent*

Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit

An illustration of a spinal cord stimulator implant, showing the device connected to leads placed along the spine, with a separate view of the skeleton and device.

Were You Injured by an Abbott, Medtronic, or Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator?

If you or a loved one suffered serious complications after receiving a spinal cord stimulator (SCS), you may have legal options. Patients across the United States have filed lawsuits alleging that defective spinal cord stimulators caused severe injuries, including permanent nerve damage, paralysis, chronic pain, infections, and the need for additional surgeries. Recent developments include the creation of new federal multidistrict litigations (MDLs) for Abbott and Nevro devices, signaling that this litigation is rapidly expanding. Untitled document

At Salenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavaro, LLP (SSKB), we are evaluating claims involving defective spinal cord stimulators and helping injured patients understand their legal rights.

What Is a Spinal Cord Stimulator?

A spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is an implanted medical device used to treat chronic pain. The system typically consists of:

  • Electrodes (leads) placed near the spinal cord
  • An implanted pulse generator (battery)
  • Software that delivers electrical impulses intended to interrupt pain signals before they reach the brain

Spinal cord stimulators are often recommended for patients with:

  • Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS)
  • Chronic back or leg pain
  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
  • Neuropathic pain
  • Other chronic pain conditions

While these devices can provide relief for some patients, lawsuits allege that certain spinal cord stimulators malfunctioned or were defectively designed, causing serious complications.

October 2026 Litigation Update

The spinal cord stimulator litigation continues to grow.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) recently created two new federal MDLs for claims involving Abbott and Nevro spinal cord stimulators:

  • Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Litigation – MDL No. 3194
    • Northern District of Illinois
    • Judge Lindsay Jenkins
  • Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Litigation – MDL No. 3195
    • Northern District of California
    • Judge Haywood Gilliam

These judges will oversee coordinated discovery and other pretrial proceedings for lawsuits involving those manufacturers. Attorneys expect the number of plaintiffs to increase significantly as additional claims are filed. Untitled document


Contact Us Today for a FREE Consultation

If you or a loved one has experienced health complications due to a spinal cord stimulator, don’t wait to seek legal help.

Contact Salenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavaro today for a FREE consultation.

Call (800) 675-8556 or contact us online to get started. 


Which Companies Are Being Sued?

Current lawsuits involve several major spinal cord stimulator manufacturers, including:

Abbott (formerly St. Jude Medical)

Allegations involve:

  • Proclaim™
  • Infinity™
  • Eterna™

Abbott devices are also associated with a Class I FDA recall involving more than 155,000 devices. Untitled document

Boston Scientific

Devices include:

  • Precision™
  • WaveWriter™
  • Infinion CX™ Leads

Certain Boston Scientific lead systems were recalled in 2026 because of lead breakage concerns. Untitled document

Medtronic

Litigation includes:

  • Intellis LT rechargeable neurostimulators
  • Related spinal cord stimulation systems Untitled document

Nevro

Current lawsuits involve:

  • Senza®
  • Related high-frequency spinal cord stimulation systems Untitled document

Why Are Patients Filing Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits?

Plaintiffs allege that certain spinal cord stimulators were defectively designed, improperly tested, or inadequately labeled, resulting in serious injuries.

Common allegations include:

Device Malfunctions

  • Lead migration
  • Lead fractures
  • Battery depletion
  • Water intrusion or seal failures
  • Unexpected electrical shocks or jolts Untitled document

Serious Injuries

Patients claim these failures resulted in:

  • Permanent nerve damage
  • Paralysis
  • Chronic pain
  • Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks
  • Serious infections
  • Additional revision or removal surgeries Untitled document

Regulatory Concerns

Some lawsuits also allege manufacturers:

  • Modified device software and firmware without adequate clinical testing
  • Used FDA supplement pathways instead of conducting new clinical trials
  • Allowed sales representatives to adjust device settings without appropriate medical qualifications Untitled document

Failure to Warn

Plaintiffs further allege manufacturers failed to adequately warn physicians and patients about:

  • Limited long-term effectiveness
  • High rates of device removal
  • Serious complications requiring additional surgery Untitled document

What Injuries May Qualify for a Lawsuit?

Potential qualifying injuries may include:

  • Permanent nerve damage
  • Paralysis
  • Worsening chronic pain
  • Loss of mobility
  • Lead migration
  • Lead fracture
  • Device malfunction
  • Cerebrospinal fluid leak
  • Infection
  • Multiple revision surgeries
  • Device removal surgery

Every case is different, and eligibility depends on the specific facts and medical evidence.

Current Status of the Litigation

The litigation continues to expand in both federal and state courts.

Current proceedings include:

  • Boston Scientific MDL No. 3181
  • Abbott MDL No. 3194
  • Nevro MDL No. 3195 Untitled document

Large global settlements have not yet been reached, and no bellwether verdicts have resolved the primary manufacturer litigation. However, individual cases have resulted in significant recoveries, including a reported $1.25 million settlement involving paralysis and bowel injuries. The document also notes that estimated future settlement values discussed by commentators are speculative and depend heavily on the severity of each case. Untitled document

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit?

A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit alleges that a defective pain-management device caused injuries such as nerve damage, paralysis, infections, or additional surgeries because of design defects, manufacturing defects, or inadequate warnings.

Which spinal cord stimulators are involved?

Current litigation includes devices manufactured by Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Nevro. Untitled document

Has an MDL been created?

Yes. Separate multidistrict litigations now exist for Abbott and Nevro devices, in addition to the Boston Scientific MDL. Untitled document Untitled document

Can I still file a claim?

Possibly. Whether you qualify depends on factors such as the manufacturer, device model, the injuries suffered, when the device was implanted, and the applicable statute of limitations. An attorney can evaluate your situation.

Why Choose SSKB?

Salenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavaro, LLP has decades of experience representing individuals harmed by dangerous products, defective medical devices, and medical negligence. We monitor emerging mass tort litigation and evaluate claims involving serious injuries caused by allegedly defective medical devices.

If you believe your spinal cord stimulator caused serious complications, our attorneys can review your case and explain your legal options.

Contact SSKB for a Free Consultation

If you or someone you love suffered paralysis, nerve damage, chronic pain, infection, or required revision surgery after receiving a spinal cord stimulator, you may have a potential claim.

Contact Salenger, Sack, Kimmel & Bavaro, LLP today for a FREE, no-obligation consultation.

Our attorneys can review your medical history, identify the manufacturer and device involved, and determine whether you may qualify to pursue compensation.

Call us today or complete our online case evaluation form to get started.

What Our Clients Are Saying

“The SSKB law firm made the right decision in adding you to their expert team of lawyers. In the future, there isn’t any other firm that I would consider to represent me.”

Jim W.

“Thank you Deborah Kurtz for being my attorney and fighting for me!”

Edwin S.

“Deborah Kurtz is a straight shooter and plays no games all while maintaining the highest level of professionalism.”

Joe M.

“I had them for a case that was very difficult this firm was the best very caring and concerned I was treated like family.”

Robbie J.

“I would highly recommend them due to the fact that during a difficult time, they made the process very straightforward with excellent results.”

Ciara L.

“This being a FELA case it was a very difficult case to handle. This firm came highly recommended to me and I now I know why.”

Joseph B.

“We were so fortunate to find this firm through a recommendation and now we have used them twice for unrelated matters. They have become our “lawyers for life”!”

Dublinshar K.

“Everyone at Salenger, Sack, Kimmel, and Bavaro was respectful and knowledgeable and kept me informed of all proceedings relative to my case as they were occurring.”

Patricia F.
Email Us
Send any details you'd like, and we'll get back to you shortly.
Consent*
SMS Consent*